Showing posts with label 911. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 911. Show all posts
A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.
Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies.
In Christison's recent article, Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11, he afforded credibility to the notion that "significant parts" of the official 9/11 story were false and after careful research he concluded that the twin towers and building 7, "were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings."
Christison went further on The Alex Jones Show, agreeing that the attacks being an inside job was the "most likely possibility."
"David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too," said Christison.
Christison initially approached the subject unwilling to even consider that elements of the government could be engaged in such heights of criminality but his research quickly began to change his mind.
"Just about half a year ago it dawned on me that not only was I trying to avoid an issue that might be extraordinarily important - more important than any other issue," said Christison.
"I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen."
Christison (pictured) stated that the suspicious collapse of the three buildings, including building 7 which wasn't hit by a plane, were likely the result of controlled demolitions.
"The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes."
"All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions."
Referencing the 2.3 trillion dollars that was discovered to be missing from the Pentagon's coffers, Christison emphasized the fact that with an unlimited budget, the scope of operations that could be undertaken by the military-industrial complex are almost without recourse.
"There is so much money now sloshing around throughout not only the CIA but the intelligence components of the Defense Department - which are actually bigger than the CIA - that these guys can do almost anything they want these days."
Christison said that one of the subsidiary motives behind 9/11 was to take attention away from an impending exposure of the missing trillions and criminal proceedings against high officials - just as LBJ had Kennedy assassinated partly to delay imminent corruption probes that would have sent him to prison.
Christison is just the latest in a deluge of former government and intelligence agency insiders to boldly go public with their doubts about the official story behind 9/11 and he has an urgent message for future whistleblowers who might be considering the same course of action.
"We have got to be willing to be discredited, we have got to stick our necks out - this is just plain too important."
Without question the official 9/11 Commission Report, formally known as the “Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States”, represents the most unsupported, contrived and ridiculous work of fiction ever produced by the US Federal Government. In fact, it represents the greatest conspiracy theory in American history ever foisted on the American people, as well as on the world-at-large. The 9/11 Commission Report details a conspiracy theory so far fetched and full of pre-meditated fabrications that one is forced to ask the question:
“If 19 Arabs with box-cutters in hand did not perpetrate this Crime of the Millennium – under the direction of a man in a cave in Afghanistan – then who might have had the incentive, as well as the extraordinary capability to perpetrate such an audacious attack?”
"The Official 9/11 Commission Report ... the most contrived, unsupported, implausible Conspiracy Theory ever foisted on the Amercian People ... Utterly ridiculous!"
Of course, the much more profound question has always remained, “Cui bono?”. Who really gains (or rather gained) the most by staging such a world-transforming and fear-generating event? Did the Afghans or Iraqis have much to benefit by subsequently being carpet bombed into oblivion? Do the Pakistanis enjoy regular drone attacks on their sovereignty? Do the Iranians appreciate constant and unwarranted threats of aggressive military action from the real Axis of Evil (USA, UK, Israel) for simply establishing a peaceful nuclear energy program?! Since the answer is an obvious “NO” to each of these and similar questions, then who is it, really, that stood to gain (and has actually gained) the most from this highly calculated and coordinated false flag operation.
Bear in mind that 9/11 has been quite effectively utilized by the political class, within certain nations around the globe, to inaugurate a full-blown, worldwide war on terror. Which nations? The USA. The United Kingdom. Israel. France. Germany. Australia. Canada. Germany. Italy. To name just a few countries that possess the capability to pull off such a convoluted scheme which included fake airliners, cruise missiles, diverted and disposed of 757’s, impossible cell phone calls from flights at 30,000 feet, total control over all surveillance cameras, etc. Shall we go on for those who still don’t get it?
For the uninitiated, please be aware of the following documented facts before you quit reading this exposé. They may very well be the most important revelations you’ll ever read about 9/11. Each of these facts overturns the uniquely telling and significant falsehoods that the US Federal Government has disseminated in the wake of these false flag attacks. Before we go deeper into the false flag nature of this operation, or dissect the true conspiracy behind this crime against humanity, however, it would be wise to understand the following ten falsehoods which are currently understood by many around the world to conclusively overturn the “verdicts” issued by the 9/11 Commission Report.
(1) The Twin Towers at the World Trade Center did not come down as a result of passenger airplanes hitting them. Each tower was brought down by very carefully controlled demolitions which ensured that each would fall “nicely” into their own footprint. From all credible and authoritative sources this demolition was carried out through the use of thermonuclear and micro-nuclear devices strategically placed throughout the two buildings in order to quickly compromise their main support systems.
Both photos do contain many signatures of EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) weaponry at work on both towers. WTCI and II were not just pulverized and dustified, but also vaporized. Remember the lack of evidence which resulted from the most intensive crime scene investigation in US history. Only DEW (directed energy electromagnetic weapons) could have produced such an effect.
There does appears to be other very advanced and sophisticated weaponry involved as well, but we postpone that discussion until later. Never in history have steel framed and reinforced buildings come down like this no matter what the degree of fire damage. So, the question remains, “What did they do with American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, since they clearly did not fly into the North and South Twin Towers?!”
The following link provides indisputable proof that many explosions were heard by firefighters and others throughout the twin tower complex on 911.
(2) Building #7 was never hit by an airplane and had small isolated fires apparently started by unknown individuals. Clearly this was not even close to what would be required to trigger what amounts to one of the most precisely controlled demolitions in NYC history. Watch the many videos on the internet which captured Building #7 falling perfectly into its own footprint.
Even Larry Silverstein, the recent owner of the World Trade Center Complex, was recorded as saying “Pull it.” to those individuals who had apparently planted the demolition charges strategically around the building prior to September 11th. Sounds like the execution of an extremely well planned, calculated and deliberate plan to bring down Building #7.
The question does remain, “Why #7?” Not how did they do it, but why did they do it, and at 5:21 pm on the very same day. Actually the most extraordinary factoid regarding this phase of the government’s true conspiracy is the fact that “BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell.”
BBC Announcer reporting on the demolition of Building #7 20 minutes before it actually fell!?
Here is an actual video of the controlled demolition of Building #7 compared to other controlled demolitions: Building 7 Controlled Demolition
Snapshot of the perfectly controlled demolition of Building #7 at the WTC
(3) The airliner that never hit the Pentagon – American Airlines Flight 77 – was in fact a very purposefully aimed missile; perhaps a cruise missile, whose unusually small point of entry is now well documented on the internet.
In the words of Major General Albert Stubblebine who “was the commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984 (Per Wikipedia), the hole left by the missile is entirely too small to be the signature of a Boeing 757. As he heroically declared, “It just doesn’t fit!” “ …a 757 doesn’t fit the hole in the Pentagon.” In other words a huge airliner did not, and could not, have hit the Pentagon. It was a missile strike which could have only been carried out by one of the US Military Services, either the Air Force or Navy.
This following website provides a photo-documentary eliminating the possibility that a Boeing 757 ever hit the Pentagon: http://911review.org/brad.com/noplane.html
How in the world does a 757 make an exit hole at the Pentagon at great distance from the point of Entry?! Below is a picture of the exit hole in the C-Ring (third ring inwards) of the Pentagon.
Also, here is an analysis and photos of an exit hole at the Pentagon which could not have been caused by the missing 757: The Pentagon Exit Hole
Lastly, we offer this Photo-Documentary from TruthWeather.com which presents the compelling and indisputable pictorial evidence proving that the Pentagon was penetrated by a missile, not a Boeing 757. There is some memorable commentary found in this report as follows:
Moments after missile impact: Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army: “When you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”
Let’s now have a look at #4 on this list of whoppers … each of them qualifying as one of the “GREATEST WHOPPERS OF ALL TIME”!
The alleged crater left by the alleged Boeing 757 that allegedly crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
(4) The coroner who showed up at the crime scene in Shanksville, PA remarked that he never attended a crime scene so bloodless and lacking in bodies, or body parts, as where the 4th airliner supposedly slammed in the ground killing all passengers after being blown out of the air by US Air Force. In other words United Airlines Flight 93 never crashed in Stonycreek Township, PA. Numerous eye-witness accounts speak to several other anomalies which simply don’t stack up with the official version. For instance the following video portrays some of the sentiments of Wally Miller, Shanksville Coroner: 9/11 Flight 93 Shanksville : Wally Miller & Human Remains
Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06am on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11.
He was stunned at how small the smoking crater looked, he says, “like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it.” Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, “I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there.”
Immediately after the crash, the seeming absence of human remains led the mind of coroner Wally Miller to a surreal fantasy: that Flight 93 had somehow stopped in mid-flight and discharged all of its passengers before crashing.
“There was just nothing visible,” he says. “It was the strangest feeling.” It would be nearly an hour before Miller came upon his first trace of a body part.
Not a single drop of blood or body part at the crime scene in Shanksville, PA?
9/11: AnINSIDE JOB and FALSE FLAG Operation of Awesome Complexity
We have just reported on four (4) of the primary elements of the 9/11 staged attacks on the USA and, as you can see, none of them are anywhere near the official narrative. We, therefore, have a very serious problem to deal with. So serious that, based on these easily confirmed facts, together with reams of circumstantial evidence, everything about the events of 9/11 points unequivocally to the direct complicity of the US Federal Government in the planning, coordination, execution and cover-up of this crime against its own citizens.
Furthermore, because of the extremely complex and coordinated cover-up which such a complicated, multi-location crime spree required, there are numerous individuals-in-charge, federal bureaucracies, state agencies, county and city departments (especially local police and county sheriff departments), military services, law enforcement entities and intelligence agencies to include the CIA, NSA, FBI, which have a lot of explaining to do. The list of “unindicted co-conspirators” includes first and foremost some of the most senior members of the executive, legislative and judicial branches in office before, during and after the 9/11 attacks.
Before we move on to six more falsehoods peddled as 9/11 facts, it would be helpful if the reader could view all future evidence through the following lens: That the 9/11 Commission Report was created as a completely fabricated story issued to erroneously confirm many of the false reports and untrue statements which were made on and following 9/11 by the government, and circulated by the media. The first four major components of this debunking process, however, are key, as they are critical to understanding the awesome breadth and depth of the actual conspiracy.
Are all nine of these Commissioners participants in a major coverup? How could they possibly not know they were being lied to by everyone involved in the investigation?
Certainly the internet has allowed many researchers and investigators to quite authoritatively dismantle the official narrative. Collaborative efforts and the sharing of privileged information have permitted an unprecedented public dissection of the entire 9/11 crime scene. So persuasive are the many technical and scientific analyses, assessments and evaluations, that even before these other six major discrepancies are looked at closely, it is indisputable that the first four conclusive refutations listed above thoroughly disproves the ‘official’ and patently false 9/11 Commission Report.
We will continue our debunking of the most implausible and ludicrous conspiracy theory known as the “9/11 Commission Report” in Part II. We will address six more obvious holes in this fraudulent and deliberately misleading government inquiry. Can you believed that we – the taxpayers – paid for this attempt to profoundly deceive the American people? As well as to deceive the entire community of nations in an effort to justify for an equally deceptive War on Terror? Clearly, this is a case where the coverup has been more deadly than the crime itself.
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a congressional panel on Thursday that any Afghan-led peace process would have to include the Quetta Shura and its leader Mulla Omar.
Her statement before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs also emphasised several other key points reflecting a major change in US approach towards seeking a peaceful end to the Afghan conflict. “There is no solution in the region without Pakistan and no stable future in the region without a partnership.”
The US needs to negotiate with the Haqqani network while continuing to work with Pakistan to destroy the safe havens it has inside Fata.
The US aid to Pakistan should not be conditioned to disbanding Lashkar-i-Taiba. And the “real game-changer in the region” would be a stronger relationship between Pakistan and India.
Her statement indicated that the new US approach had evolved further after Secretary Clinton’s visit to Afghanistan and Pakistan last week where she discussed this strategy with the leaders of those two countries as well.
After the visit, she told the US media that the United States and Pakistan had reached 90-95 per cent agreement on the issues that at one stage appeared close to breaking up their relationship.
The lawmakers, who still seem upset with Pakistan over its alleged links to the militants, created several opportunities for the secretary to browbeat Pakistan but she refrained from doing so.
Congressman Steve Chabot, a Republican, asked Secretary Clinton if the US was prepared to negotiate with Mulla Omar. “And if so, under what circumstances and what would our conditions be?” he asked.
“Well, Congressman, the negotiations that would be part of any Afghan-led peace process would have to include the Quetta Shura and would have to include some recognition by the Quetta Shura which, based on everything we know, is still led by Mulla Omar, that they wish to participate in such a process,” she responded. “We are pursuing every thread of any kind of interest expressed.”
Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the panel’s chairperson, questioned the wisdom of engaging the Haqqani network while it continued to attack US soldiers in Afghanistan. “What’s the US strategy, crackdown or negotiate with the Haqqani network or a little bit of both,” she asked.
“It’s both,” said Secretary Clinton.
Later, while responding to Congressman Chabot, she said the US agreed to meet the Haqqani network because that the ISI had asked them to do so.
“This was done in part because I think the Pakistanis hope to be able to move the Haqqani network towards some kind of peace negotiation and the answer was an attack on our embassy” in Kabul.
The US still wanted to stay engaged with the Haqqani network to test whether these organisations had any willingness to negotiate in good faith, she told Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen.
“There is evidence going both ways, to be clear. Sometimes we hear that they will, that there are elements within each that wish to pursue that, and then other times that it’s off the table.” she added.
Secretary Clinton noted that only last week the US had launched a major military operation in Afghanistan that rounded up and eliminated more than 100 Haqqani network operatives. “And we are taking action to target the Haqqani leadership on both sides of the border,” she said. “We are already working with the Pakistanis to target those who are behind a lot of the attacks against Afghans and Americans.”
Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen asked Secretary Clinton to comment on a recent statement by Afghan President Hamid Karzai that if there was war between Pakistan and America, he would side with Pakistan.
Secretary Clinton said that as soon as she heard this statement, she asked the US ambassador in Kabul to figure out what Mr Karzai meant and the ambassador reported back that Mr Karzai was talking about the long history of cooperation between Afghanistan and Pakistan, in particular the refuge that Pakistan provided to millions of Afghans during the Soviet occupation.
“This was not at all about a war that anybody was predicting,” she said. Responding to a question about recent remarks by US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and former military chief Admiral Mike Mullen, who blamed Pakistan for continuing to support the militants, Secretary Clinton said that neither Mr Panetta nor Admiral Mullen ever questioned the need to stay engaged with Pakistan.
She said that everyone in the US administration believed that the Haqqanis had safe havens inside Pakistan and used these hideouts for attacking US and Afghan soldiers.
“And we also agree, however, … that there is no solution in the region without Pakistan and no stable future in the region without a partnership.”
Congressman Ed Royce, another Republican, reminded her that another congressional panel had asked the Obama administration to condition US assistance to Pakistan to shutting down the LeT and asked her if she was willing to do so.
“We have had intensive discussions with our Indian counterparts” on the LeT and on the attacks it allegedly carried out in India. But “I do not want to commit at this time to taking such a path because I think it’s important that there be further consideration of all of the implications,” Secretary Clinton said.
“Certainly, every time we meet with the Pakistanis, we press them on the LeT about the continuing failure, in our view, to fulfil all of the requirements necessary for prosecution related to the Mumbai attacks and we will continue to do so,” she said.
Secretary Clinton said that like the congressman, she too worried about the possibility that LeT attacks inside India could trigger yet another war between India and Pakistan. “And we discuss it in great depth with our Indian counterparts, because it is, first and foremost, a concern of theirs. It is obviously also concerning to us.”
Congressman Joe Wilson, also a Republican, noted that Pakistan was developing a most-favoured nation trade status with India and asked what the US could do to promote a level of trade and positive contact between India and Pakistan.
“Well, Congressman, I agree with you that the real game-changer in the region is not so much our bilateral relationship as the relationship between Pakistan and India. And the more that there can be progress, the more likely there can be even more progress,” the secretary said.
“So we have in Pakistan today a leadership, both civilian and military, that wants to see progress with India, and we have the same on the Indian side.”
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.
Source - Original Link of this article is from www.dawn.com
Posts
