The United Nations (UN) General Assembly has adopted a resolution, calling on States using drone strikes as a counter terrorism measure to comply with international law as the 193-member body acted on a range of issues relating mainly to human rights.
The unanimous call for regulating the use of remotely piloted aircraft against suspected terrorists was contained in a comprehensive 28 paragraph resolution entitled Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism.
The portion about drone strikes were included as a result of intensive efforts made by the Pakistan delegation. It is the first that the General Assembly has spoken out on the use of armed drones, a key but controversial component of the US war against terrorism including against targets in Pakistan.
In this regard the Assembly underscored the urgent and imperative need for an agreement among member states on legal questions about drone operations. The resolution urges States to ensure that any measures taken or means employed to counter terrorism including the use of remotely piloted aircraft comply with their obligations under international law including the Charter of the United Nations human rights law and international humanitarian law in particular the principles of distinction and proportionality.
The text also calls for taking into account Relevant United Nations resolutions and decisions on human rights and encourages them to give due consideration to the recommendations of the special procedures and mechanisms of the Human Rights Council and to the relevant comments and views of United Nations human rights treaty bodies.
The resolution also takes note of the report of the Special Rapporteur Ben Emersson which refers inter alia to the use of remotely piloted aircraft and notes the recommendations including the urgent and imperative need to seek agreement among member states on legal questions pertaining to remotely piloted aircraft operations.
The text also encouraged states while countering terrorism to undertake prompt independent and impartial fact finding inquiries whenever there are plausible indications of possible breaches to their obligations under international human rights law with a view to ensuring accountability.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment